diff --git a/evaluation.mat b/evaluation.mat
index 167fa78..622a019 100644
--- a/evaluation.mat
+++ b/evaluation.mat
Binary files differ
diff --git a/text/TODO.txt b/text/TODO.txt
index a62485f..2252fae 100644
--- a/text/TODO.txt
+++ b/text/TODO.txt
@@ -102,3 +102,4 @@
 BCI2000 - what does the signal values (int) mean?
 via finally fixed \o/
 mean on EMG?
+evaluation in M&M or Results?
diff --git a/text/thesis/02MaterialsAndMethods.tex b/text/thesis/02MaterialsAndMethods.tex
index 36cdb24..c1d5601 100644
--- a/text/thesis/02MaterialsAndMethods.tex
+++ b/text/thesis/02MaterialsAndMethods.tex
@@ -201,6 +201,7 @@
             \label{alg:cv}
         \end{algorithm}
 \section{Experimental design}
+\label{mm:design}
     The data used for this work were mainly recorded by Farid Shiman, Nerea Irastorza-Landa, and Andrea Sarasola-Sanz for their work (\cite{Shiman15},\cite{Sarasola15}). We were allowed to use them for further analysis.\\
     There were 9 right-handed subjects with an average age of 25 (variance 6.67, minimum 20, maximum 28). Three female and 6 male subjects were tested. All the tasks were performed with the dominant right hand.\\
     To perform was a center-out reaching task to one of four targets (see \ref{fig:experimentalDesign}) while 32 channel EEG, at least%
@@ -366,6 +367,9 @@
     \subsection{Prediction with interim step}
         All these analyses only show the accuracy of one step. To get a measure for the over-all performance we predict synergies from EEG and use them to predict EMG or kinematics respectively.\\
         The resulting correlation is the mean of the correlations of a 10-fold cross validation where the same unknown synergies are predicted from EEG and used to predict EMG or kinematics. So there is no correction step between the steps and EMG or kinematics are predicted from EEG via the Synergies. Here also different methods to determine Synergies are compared (see Section~\ref{res:differentSynergiesVia}).
+    \subsection{Multiple Sessions}
+        We analyze each session (cf. Section~\ref{mm:design}) independently meaning there are 51 independent results for each analysis. These are used for the statistical evaluation in Chapter~\ref{chp:results}.\\
+        Some analyses are only done on one session - if so it will be clearly stated. %TODO: check, out if not necessary
     \subsection{Evaluation}
 
 %TODO: evaluation
diff --git a/text/thesis/03Results.tex b/text/thesis/03Results.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9a90c37
--- /dev/null
+++ b/text/thesis/03Results.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+\chapter{Results}
+\label{chp:results}
diff --git a/text/thesis/thesis.tex b/text/thesis/thesis.tex
index 3f74a9b..90f7a83 100644
--- a/text/thesis/thesis.tex
+++ b/text/thesis/thesis.tex
@@ -215,9 +215,9 @@
 \input{02MaterialsAndMethods}
 \cleardoublepage
 
-%% Results
-% \input{03Results}
-% \cleardoublepage
+% Results
+\input{03Results}
+\cleardoublepage
 
 %% Discussion
 % \input{04Discussion}
diff --git a/usedMcode/evaluation.m b/usedMcode/evaluation.m
index d1a401c..911a07d 100644
--- a/usedMcode/evaluation.m
+++ b/usedMcode/evaluation.m
@@ -24,5 +24,5 @@
 correlations.LF.pos.(sprintf('%s',name))=correlationLFpos;
 
 
-save('/home/jph/Uni/masterarbeit/evaluation.mat','meanAccurancys','correlations')
+save('/home/jph/Uni/masterarbeit/evaluation.mat','accurancys','correlations')
 clear